The Future Is One That Is Of Population Control
Posted in Government on January 31st, 2009The title maybe old news to you, but what happened? did you suddenly become quashed by the greater powers that run the Country or are you actually happy with where we are all headed for ours and future generations to come? A previous piece on the topic of ID cards provoke a similar feeling of unease with the concept of being monitored even more than we already are and somehow, our daily lives are encroached upon even more in being told what to do and how we should do things.
In England in the UK, a child protection database is being launched with plans to expand it across the UK. It has apparently taken almost 9 years to complete and perfect the technology, having discovered technological delays along the way.
It has taken many years to implement the database and training is taking place for over 300,000 professionals who work with children with access to the database. There is no opt-out option for any parent who wishes for their child’s information to be removed from the database. The project itself has cost millions of pounds and I wonder how long it will last. Without wanting to sound too pessimistic, I am not quite sure what exactly is helpful about having the details of a child’s address, parents’ contact details, date of birth, school and doctor of every child in England, when most places your child might be, like school for example, will already have these details. Every child will have a unique identifying number, it is claimed that the database will improve co-ordination between the thousands of professionals working with children.
The above is not all that will be stored, education authorities will be alerted as to whether a child has come to be flagged up by social services or health workers. Local authorities, health services, childrens’ charities and the police will also be among those who have access to the database.
The only children who will be safe guarded and not on the list are those who are in danger from being on the list. I wonder, how do they come to be safeguarded and why is there an exception for them to be on the list if the database is being used by professionals only, who would they be at threat from?
There are plans for the adult professionals working with children also to be on another child protection register, storing their details as adults also.
It is proposed that the same will be done for 11 million adults in the UK according to The Independent Safeguarding Authority.
Is it really necessary that so many people have access to such sensitive information? There are many scenarios that come to mind with the possible dangers of such information being so freely accessed. How simple would it be for someone to start really messing about with peoples lives, maybe change or delete some information on their personal file, would the database track these changes also. And is the local doctor going to be checking out his neighbours who happen to be parents in his spare time?
I appreciate that it is important to keep people safe, and especially children given the evil that bestows the planet in many shapes and forms, children and adults alike can be subjected to violence, mental abuse, neglect, murder or physical abuse, no child should have to be subjected to any, amongst many other examples and neither should an adult. But we as people know that sometimes the streets are not safe, crimes exist and that bad things can and do happen.
We are already aware that government blunders are always in character and I needn’t really mention HMRC and the recent loss of data of millions of people’s personal information to reiterate my point, but are we relying upon technology when really we should be focusing on looking at the things that cause us to have the need for what I called paranoid acts of monitoring. I would also like to point out with regards to the database, that the technological delays were no minor issues evidently after so many years of production, how sound is its reliability?.
I appreciate that a social worker can maybe work on a case and be able to act on any concerns at hand or deal with presented issues for example, maybe quickly or more efficiently than that of present, but there are millions of unsolved crimes, and who’s to say the culprit for any one of these crimes isn’t one of the over 300,000 people with access to sensitive information who has just never been caught? We can only control so much, and to control essentially everything is impossible and also unnecessary.
We certainly shouldn’t put our trust in everybody, this fresh in my mind from some of this month’s events, but why should we put our trust in technology also? After all, it provides none of the essential needs of human necessities, is a link to many cases of fraud and identity theft, but it does have its uses, including this blog.
Rather than a database, which could easily corrupt files or easily be corrupted, I believe there are more appropriate uses of an initial start up cost of £224 million and an annual £41 million pounds to maintain.
£41 million alone annually, not to mention the £224 million that could have been spent in other productive ways, fuelling small businesses, funding investments, creating industry to create more jobs, land reclamation, local community projects and so on. Giving people more productive things to do to occupy their time rather than invest in technology that is essentially a giant human microscope. Sure there were possibly more jobs created for the production, use and maintenance of the technology behind the database, but did it create many jobs and for the long term? and to what necessity?
What if we did have a giant human microscope and used it to monitor the planet and all it contains via one mother-ship of a computer as suggested in many sci-fi flicks, would we then decide that we know who the baddies are and as nations all unite, dig out the bad from the good and in what manner would we deal with the presented problem? Would we hook up the offenders to a self zapping taser and electrocute them for their every bad deed?. Will we blast them out into space on a giant catapult and leave them to the future of being space junk? The resolve to these possibilities is leaning toward the probability of them not happening. And speaking of things not happening, control is a word that stands upright starkly announcing itself with clear audacity, as we as humans do not have super powers or super human abilities to be able to control all and everything. Therefore, we can not always control the loss of data, the crimes of others, the actions of others, we can only accept what time has produced and has and will present to us.
Why do we try to emphasise control over the already in existence measures of control? We have customs at airports, national security amongst other known government agencies, national insurance numbers, several forms of identity, police and authorities and various other forms of control. Yet things still happen as they are out of our control and a database cannot and will not change that. It can provide statistics, however, in the case where a child is concerned, statistics are not what’s necessarily needed. With all the governments plans for improvements based on technology, I am highly sceptical and also slightly concerned at the nanny state approach that is creeping upon us with great pace.